Analysis of Pedestrian Pathway Needs on Jalan Pajjaiang, Sudiang Sports Arena Segment, Makassar City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52722/jq73dm25Keywords:
pedestrian path, level of service, pedestrian, sidewalkAbstract
326
Adequate facilities are essential for ensuring safe, comfortable, and smooth pedestrian movement. Pedestrian activity along the Pajjaiang Road segment in front of the Sudiang Sports Hall (GOR Sudiang) in Makassar City is significant, particularly during the morning and evening hours. However, sidewalk conditions are suboptimal, characterized by a lack of continuity (existing on only one side), damage, and obstructions that restrict available walking space. This study aims to analyze pedestrian infrastructure needs based on existing conditions, pedestrian characteristics, Level of Service (LOS), required sidewalk width, and crossing facilities. Data regarding sidewalk conditions, pedestrian volume, travel time, walking speed, and vehicle volume were obtained through field surveys. The analysis was conducted in accordance with the 2023 Guidelines for Pedestrian Facility Planning. The results indicate that pedestrian volumes ranged from a high of 363 persons/hour to a low of 159 persons/hour. Suboptimal sidewalk conditions force some pedestrians to walk on the roadway itself. The analysis suggests a recommended sidewalk width of 1.67 meters. Based on a pedestrian volume of 313 persons/hour and a vehicle volume of 1,332 vehicles/hour, the crossing facility value calculated using the PV² method is 555,332,112.00. Consequently, a Pelican crossing with a waiting area is recommended. Upgrading and providing proper crossing facilities are necessary to enhance safety, comfort, and pedestrian mobility.
Downloads
References
[1] I. T. S. Kaontole, A. L. E. Rumayar, dan M. M. Kumaat, “Analisis Karakteristik dan Tingkat Pelayanan Arus Pejalan Kaki (Studi Kasus: Jl. Suprapto – Jl. Lembong),” TEKNO, vol. 21, no. 84, hlm. 627–638, 2023, doi: 10.35793/jts.v21i84.48457.
[2] I. B. Wirahaji, I. W. Muka, M. N. Indriani, I. M. Wisudana, dan I. G. F. S. Tapa, “Analisis Karakteristik dan Tingkat Pelayanan Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Wisata Ubud: (Studi Kasus: Jalan Raya Ubud, Gianyar),” J. Ilm. Telsinas Elektro Sipil Dan Tek. Inf., vol. 8, no. 1, hlm. 64–73, Apr 2025, doi: 10.38043/telsinas.v8i1.6115.
[3] A. Adilah, E. Buchari, dan M. Agustien, “Analisis Kebutuhan Fasilitas Pedestrian di Kawasan Stasiun,” J. Penelit. Sekol. Tinggi Transp. Darat, vol. 15, no. 1, hlm. 32–45, Jul 2024, doi: 10.55511/jpsttd.v15i1.671.
[4] N. Annaz dan N. Tinumbia, “Analisis Kinerja Fasilitas Pedestrian Dalam Mendukung Integrasi Antarmoda Angkutan Umum di Perkotaan,” J. ARTESIS, vol. 3, no. 1, hlm. 1–9, Mei 2023, doi: 10.35814/artesis.v3i1.5018.
[5] A. Ayuningtias dan W. Hadi, “Analisis Kesesuaian Pembangunan Jalur Pedestrian di Jl. H. R. Rasuna Said (Sisi Barat) Pasca Revitalisasi Berdasarkan Permen,” Indo Publ., vol. 1, no. 5, hlm. 2854–2868, doi: 10.63822/0200hj25.
[6] T. A. Pambudi, “Analisis Keterpenuhinya Kebutuhan Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki Berdasarkan Persepsi Penguna pada Trotoar Jalan R.A. Kartini, Bekasi,” J. Multidisiplin Ilmu Akad., vol. 3, no. 3, hlm. 986–996, doi: 10.61722/jmia.v3i3.10514.
[7] H. C. Oktavia dan R. Sari, “Analisis Kualitas Layanan Aset Jalur Pedestrian di Jalan Astanaanyar Berdasarkan Konsep Walkability,” J. Reg. Rural Dev. Plan. J. Perenc. Pembang. Wil. Dan Perdesaan, vol. 10, no. 1, hlm. 21–35, 2026, doi: 10.29244/jp2wd.2026.10.1.21-35.
[8] A. S. H. Aswaty, M. Manaf, dan K. Aksa, “Strategi Peningkatan Walkability Index Di Kawasan Bisnis Dan Wisata Di Kota Makassar,” Urban Reg. Stud. J., vol. 7, no. 1, hlm. 52–63, Des 2024, doi: 10.35965/ursj.v7i1.4609.
[9] A. Abubakar, M. S. Alim, dan L. B. Said, “Analisis Persepsi Tingkat Kenyamanan Pejalan Kaki Terhadap Pemanfaatan Trotoar Jalan Perkotaan Kasus di Jalan Ahmad Yani, HOS Cokroaminoto Kota Makassar,” J. Ilm. Mhs. Tek. Sipil JILMATEKS, vol. 4, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.33096/r1rtvp82.
[10] A. Kurniawan, Y. Alwinda, dan B. Hamdi Rhoma Putra, “Studi Kenyamanan Pejalan Kaki di Trotoar pada Kawasan Jalan Jendral Ahmad Yani Kota Pekanbaru Provinsi Riau,” J. Infrastruct. Civ. Eng., vol. 2, no. 01, hlm. 47–59, Apr 2022, doi: 10.35583/jice.v2i01.14.
[11] S. N. Asis, K. Aksa, dan R. Arief, “Studi Tingkat Kenyamanan Jalur Pedestrian di Kawasan Jalan Somba Opu, Makassar,” J. Urban Plan. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, hlm. 61–67, Nov 2022, doi: 10.35965/jups.v3i1.329.
[12] F. D. Irawan, R. Apdeni, F. Ashar, dan F. Rifwan, “Analisis Tingkat Pelayanan Fasilitas Pedestrian Jalan Pasar Baru Kota Padang,” J. Appl. Sci. Civ. Eng., vol. 6, no. 4, hlm. 561–566, 2025, doi: 10.24036/asce.v6i4.1418.
[13] B. Tanan, D. Arselina, dan L. E. Radjawane, “Analisis Tingkat Pelayanan Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki di Ruas Jalan Lamadukelleng,” Paulus Civ. Eng. J. PCEJ, vol. 5, no. 4, hlm. 658–670, 2023.
[14] I. T. Batu’, M. Selintung, dan L. E. Radjawane, “Evaluasi Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki di Jalan Masjid Raya Kota Makassar,” Paulus Civ. Eng. J. PCEJ, vol. 6, no. 4, hlm. 658–666, 2024, doi: 10.52722/8h253305.
[15] S. M. R. Alhadad, S. Mayuni, dan S. Said, “Study of Pedestrian Facilities on Jalan Sutan Syahrir and Jalan K.H. Agus Salim, Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat,” J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 26, no. 1, hlm. 2661–2671, Feb 2026, doi: 10.26418/jts.v26i1.93201.
Journal Template
