Penjadwalan Proyek Konstruksi Perumahan Menggunakan Metode Queuing System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52722/57gghx47Keywords:
critical path method, konstruksi repetitif, manajemen proyek, manajemen produksi, sistem antreanAbstract
Housing development project is a construction activity characterized by repetitive construction activities, as the models and sizes of the houses built are generally similar and constructed repeatedly within a limited area. The conventional scheduling method, the Critical Path Method (CPM), is frequently applied in construction projects, however, CPM is less effective for repetitive construction as in housing development project because it does not account for the number of work units waiting to be processed (queuing). This study aims to analyze the application of the queuing system/queueing method in the planning and control of housing construction project schedules in Palu City, Indonesia. The research adopts a quantitative approach with descriptive and predictive analyses, utilizing field observations, interviews, and document analysis. Housing construction activity data are analyzed using the CPM and subsequently compared with a queuing system model through computer simulation. The results indicate that the queuing system method represents workflow more realistically than CPM, particularly in accounting for waiting times and production capacity at each construction stage. This approach is expected to enhance time and resource efficiency in repetitive housing construction projects and to contribute to the development of construction management based on production system principles.
Downloads
References
[1] H. Bashford, A. Sawhney, K. D. Walsh, and K. Kot, “Implications of Even Flow Production Methodology for U.S. Housing Industry,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 330–337, 2003.
[2] S. A. Mubarak, Construction Project Scheduling and Control, 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010.
[3] J. R. Turner, The Handbook of Project-Based Management: Leading Strategic Change in Organizations, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2009.
[4] J. D. C. Little, “OR FORUM—Little’s Law as Viewed on Its 50th Anniversary,” Operations Research, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 536–549, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1287/opre.1110.0940.
[5] H. Bashford, A. Sawhney, K. Walsh, and J. Thompson, “Residential Construction and the Influence of Inspections on Cycle Time,” ASCE, 2005, pp. 15–15.
[6] A. Fadjar, A. A. Ali, and A. Setiawan, “Resource Utilization and Repetitive Construction Scheduling using the Discrete Event Simulation Method,” Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 20702–20708, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.48084/etasr.9795.
[7] H. Kerzner, Project management : A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling, 10th ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
[8] R. Harris and P. Ioannou, “Scheduling Projects with Repeating Activities,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 269–278, 1998, doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:4(269).
[9] L. Koskela, “Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction,” CIFE, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 72, 1992.
[10] R. Yamín and D. Harmelink, “Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model (LSM) and Critical Path Method (CPM),” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 374–381, 2001, doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:5(374).
[11] W. J. Hopp and M. L. Spearman, Factory physics, 3rd ed. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press, 2011.
[12] A. Potter, D. R. Towill, and J. Gosling, “On the versatility of Little’s Law in operations management: a review and classification using vignettes,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 437–452, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1647363.
[13] C. R. Kothari, Research methodology: methods & techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd., 2004. Accessed: Oct. 26, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=431524
[14] I. Etikan, “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling,” AJTAS, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
[15] Permen PUPR No. 28, “Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 28/PRT/M/2016 Tentang Pedoman Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Bidang Pekerjaan Umum.” Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, 2016.
Journal Template
