ANALYSIS OF LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS IN JUDGES' ACQUITTAL DECISIONS IN CORRUPTION CASES IN INDONESIA

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the legal considerations used by judges in deciding acquittals in corruption cases in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical with a qualitative approach. The results indicate that acquittals are often based on insufficient evidence, procedural errors in investigation, and the application of the presumption of innocence principle. Judges also consider the credibility of witnesses, the integrity of evidence, and the principle of legality in making their decisions. Additionally, oversight by the Supreme Court ensures that acquittals are in accordance with prevailing laws and principles of justice. In conclusion, although acquittals are often controversial, the legal considerations by judges in corruption cases are generally in line with principles of justice and applicable law. Continuous efforts are needed to improve the quality of investigations, consistency in legal interpretation, and the integrity of judges to enhance public trust in the judicial system.